Savage, Meghan Collins and also Donovan, Neila J. (2014)Comparing linguistic complexity and efficiency in conversations from Stimulation Therapy and also Conversation therapy in Aphasia.

*
PDF476-846-1-RV(Savage-Donovan).pdf Download (62kB)

Abstract

The ultimate goal because that speech language pathology interventions for human being with aphasia (PWA) is to have the ability to converse as normally as feasible (Armstrong & Mortensen, 2006). However, there are many approaches to aphasia therapy and various result measures. For instance, Stimulation therapy (ST) counts on structured repetition and drill come elicit language, while conversation treatment (CT) provides client-clinician conversation and conversation analysis to improve day-to-day language. Most speech language pathologists use standardized exam or rating develops to measure treatment progress rather 보다 measuring conversations (Boles, 1998).We aimed come compare distinctions in linguistic complexity and efficiency in conversational outcomes in two treatment types, ST and also CT. Researchers have examined the linguistic abilities of PWA and aging adult by evaluating language samples (Capilouto et al., 2005; Kemper & Sumner, 2001); however few people have actually examined linguistic complexity in conversation as a treatment outcome measure.Conversational performance measured in Correct details Units (CIUs)/minute is a valid and also reliable means to measure development in linked speech (Nicholas and also Brookshire, 1993). Efficiency can it is in measured through calculating CIUs/minute or % CIUs. Researchers have used %CIUs to measure efficiency in conversations (Doyle, Goda & Spencer, 1995) and CIUs/minute in story-telling (Jacobs, 2001). However, no one has reported utilizing CIUs/minute to measure up efficiency throughout conversational interactions.To resolve this us asked the complying with questions:1. Go CT bring about a greater increase in linguistic intricacy than ST based upon the complying with measures of etymological complexity:a) Mean length of utterance (in words) (MLU)?b) Type/token ratio (TTR)?c) number of different indigenous (NDW)?d) Percent the utterance responses?e) Percent of simple utterances?f) Percent of facility utterances?g) Propositional density?2. Go ST bring about improved efficiency of conversation?3. Walk CT lead to improved effectiveness of conversation?4. Is conversational efficiency various when ST is contrasted to CT?5.


You are watching: Which of the following is not true about the mean length of utterance (mlu)?


See more: Give A Recursive Definition Of The Sequence {Aₙ}, Recursive Sequence

Is over there a difference between clinician and also participant complete talk time during conversation probes taken during both treatments?

item Type: Depositing User: day Deposited: critical Modified: Conference: URI:
Clinical stillproud.org document
Leo Johnson
17 Jun 2015
31 Oct 2016 15:13
Clinical stillproud.org Conference > Clinical stillproud.org Conference (2014 : 44th : St. Simons Island, GA : might 27-June 1, 2014
http://stillproud.org/id/eprint/2535

Actions (login required)

*
View Item

*

The stillproud.org archive is powered by EPrints 3 and also hosted by the college of stillproud.orgsburgh university Library system