Consider the threats for a constitutional democracy the this possibly explosive mixture: a stalemated war, an unpopular president, and a defiant basic with a arrangement for victory and a vast public following. In the somber feather of 1951, Senators Richard Russell and also Tom Connally sought come diffuse this brewing crisis by arranging because that the committees they chaired—Armed Services and Foreign Relations—to conduct a collection of joint hearings. The topic of their inquiry was basic Douglas MacArthur. 3 weeks before, on April 11, 1951, chairman Harry Truman had fired MacArthur as commander the the unified Nations" pressures in the oriental War. Truman and the mercurial MacArthur had actually long disagreed around the best means to finish the deadlock on the korean peninsula. MacArthur wanted launching an attack on China; Truman sought diplomacy. Once MacArthur publicly criticize his command in chief, a furious Truman sacked him. Plenty of congressional Republicans taken into consideration the popular, decorated war hero to be a potential presidential candidate. ~ he returned to the united States and delivered his "farewell address" come a blatant joint conference of congress on April 19, MacArthur talk in a massive parade native the Capitol to the Washington Monument. 2 days later, millions turned the end to receive the basic in a ticker-tape parade in new York City. Versus this backdrop, senator Russell, together chairman of the share hearings, carried out the proceedings with an excellent deliberation, providing for a full exchange of views. Realizing that the testimony would encompass highly sensitive war-related testimony, but likewise aware of the value of making this discussions quickly accessible to prevent trouble-causing leaks, Russell arranged a compromise. The joint committee would certainly conduct the sessions in secret, however would relax sanitized transcripts every 30 minute to reporters crowded outside the Caucus Room"s heavily guarded doors. In 3 days the testimony, which began on might 3, 1951, MacArthur dilute his own instance with vague and also overstated responses. That observed that his troubles come from the political leaders in Washington who had introduced "a brand-new concept into military operations—the ide of appeasement." when MacArthur to be asked even if it is he believed his plan for battle China could trigger an additional world war, he observed that this was not his area the responsibility. His instance was fatally weakened v testimony from senior military leaders who strongly disagreed through MacArthur"s plan. After 7 weeks the exhaustive testimony, the public lost interest. By completely airing this attention issue, Chairman Russell avoided a political conflagration and also brilliantly demonstrated the"s proverbial function as the saucer into which the warm tea is poured to be safely cooled.

You are watching: Why did general macarthur address congress after he was fired? historical Office

Information provided by the historical Office.

See more: Man Walking In The Desert Trekking, That The World May Know

Questions around History? email a historian.